1963 AC Greyhound vs. 1998 Chevrolet Malibu
To start off, 1998 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 2,392 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Chevrolet Malibu (149 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 1963 AC Greyhound. (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 1963 AC Greyhound. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Chevrolet Malibu weights approximately 371 kg more than 1963 AC Greyhound. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1998 Chevrolet Malibu (210 Nm) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 AC Greyhound. (179 Nm). This means 1998 Chevrolet Malibu will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 AC Greyhound.
Compare all specifications:
1963 AC Greyhound | 1998 Chevrolet Malibu | |
Make | AC | Chevrolet |
Model | Greyhound | Malibu |
Year Released | 1963 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 2392 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 149 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 210 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1386 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 76 L |