1963 AC Greyhound vs. 1999 Seat Alhambra
To start off, 1999 Seat Alhambra is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 2,792 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Seat Alhambra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Seat Alhambra (201 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 78 more horse power than 1963 AC Greyhound. (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Seat Alhambra should accelerate faster than 1963 AC Greyhound. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Seat Alhambra weights approximately 735 kg more than 1963 AC Greyhound. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1999 Seat Alhambra (270 Nm) has 91 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 AC Greyhound. (179 Nm). This means 1999 Seat Alhambra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 AC Greyhound.
Compare all specifications:
1963 AC Greyhound | 1999 Seat Alhambra | |
Make | AC | Seat |
Model | Greyhound | Alhambra |
Year Released | 1963 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 2792 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 201 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 270 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1750 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2830 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 55 L |