1963 AC Greyhound vs. 2000 Chevrolet Cavalier
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Cavalier is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 2,190 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Cavalier is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 AC Greyhound (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 2000 Chevrolet Cavalier. (120 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 AC Greyhound should accelerate faster than 2000 Chevrolet Cavalier. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet Cavalier weights approximately 179 kg more than 1963 AC Greyhound.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chevrolet Cavalier (183 Nm) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 AC Greyhound. (179 Nm). This means 2000 Chevrolet Cavalier will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 AC Greyhound.
Compare all specifications:
1963 AC Greyhound | 2000 Chevrolet Cavalier | |
Make | AC | Chevrolet |
Model | Greyhound | Cavalier |
Year Released | 1963 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 2190 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 120 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 183 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1194 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4600 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2570 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 57 L |