1963 AC Greyhound vs. 2000 Chevrolet Suburban
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Suburban is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 5,327 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Suburban is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chevrolet Suburban (282 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 159 more horse power than 1963 AC Greyhound. (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Suburban should accelerate faster than 1963 AC Greyhound. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet Suburban weights approximately 1319 kg more than 1963 AC Greyhound. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chevrolet Suburban (441 Nm) has 262 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 AC Greyhound. (179 Nm). This means 2000 Chevrolet Suburban will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 AC Greyhound.
Compare all specifications:
1963 AC Greyhound | 2000 Chevrolet Suburban | |
Make | AC | Chevrolet |
Model | Greyhound | Suburban |
Year Released | 1963 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 5327 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 282 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 441 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 9 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 2334 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 5590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1950 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3310 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 117 L |