1963 AC Greyhound vs. 2000 Subaru Legacy
To start off, 2000 Subaru Legacy is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 1,994 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Subaru Legacy is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Subaru Legacy (153 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1963 AC Greyhound. (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Subaru Legacy should accelerate faster than 1963 AC Greyhound. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Subaru Legacy weights approximately 375 kg more than 1963 AC Greyhound. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Subaru Legacy (197 Nm) has 18 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 AC Greyhound. (179 Nm). This means 2000 Subaru Legacy will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 AC Greyhound.
Compare all specifications:
1963 AC Greyhound | 2000 Subaru Legacy | |
Make | AC | Subaru |
Model | Greyhound | Legacy |
Year Released | 1963 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 1994 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 153 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 197 Nm |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1390 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 64 L |