1963 AC Greyhound vs. 2001 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2001 Ford Ranger is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Ford Ranger (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 1963 AC Greyhound. (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1963 AC Greyhound. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Ford Ranger weights approximately 705 kg more than 1963 AC Greyhound. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2001 Ford Ranger (203 Nm) has 24 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 AC Greyhound. (179 Nm). This means 2001 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 AC Greyhound.
Compare all specifications:
1963 AC Greyhound | 2001 Ford Ranger | |
Make | AC | Ford |
Model | Greyhound | Ranger |
Year Released | 1963 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 128 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 203 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1720 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3010 mm |