1963 AC Greyhound vs. 2002 Ford F-250
To start off, 2002 Ford F-250 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 5,407 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford F-250 (256 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 133 more horse power than 1963 AC Greyhound. (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford F-250 should accelerate faster than 1963 AC Greyhound. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford F-250 weights approximately 1335 kg more than 1963 AC Greyhound. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Ford F-250 (474 Nm) has 295 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 AC Greyhound. (179 Nm). This means 2002 Ford F-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 AC Greyhound.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 AC Greyhound | 2002 Ford F-250 | |
| Make | AC | Ford |
| Model | Greyhound | F-250 |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 5407 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 256 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque | 179 Nm | 474 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 2350 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 5760 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1940 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3490 mm |
