1963 AC Greyhound vs. 2002 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2002 Jaguar XJ is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jaguar XJ (301 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 178 more horse power than 1963 AC Greyhound. (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1963 AC Greyhound. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 785 kg more than 1963 AC Greyhound. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jaguar XJ (541 Nm) has 362 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 AC Greyhound. (179 Nm). This means 2002 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 AC Greyhound.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 AC Greyhound | 2002 Jaguar XJ | |
| Make | AC | Jaguar |
| Model | Greyhound | XJ |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 4196 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 301 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 179 Nm | 541 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1800 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3040 mm |
