1963 AC Greyhound vs. 2003 Jaguar X-Type
To start off, 2003 Jaguar X-Type is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 2,099 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Jaguar X-Type is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Jaguar X-Type (157 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 1963 AC Greyhound. (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Jaguar X-Type should accelerate faster than 1963 AC Greyhound. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Jaguar X-Type weights approximately 540 kg more than 1963 AC Greyhound. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Jaguar X-Type (196 Nm) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 AC Greyhound. (179 Nm). This means 2003 Jaguar X-Type will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 AC Greyhound.
Compare all specifications:
1963 AC Greyhound | 2003 Jaguar X-Type | |
Make | AC | Jaguar |
Model | Greyhound | X-Type |
Year Released | 1963 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 2099 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 157 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 196 Nm |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1555 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 61 L |