1963 AC Greyhound vs. 2003 MG TF
To start off, 2003 MG TF is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 AC Greyhound is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 MG TF (158 HP @ 6900 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 1963 AC Greyhound. (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 MG TF should accelerate faster than 1963 AC Greyhound. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 MG TF weights approximately 175 kg more than 1963 AC Greyhound. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1963 AC Greyhound (179 Nm) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 MG TF. (174 Nm). This means 1963 AC Greyhound will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 MG TF.
Compare all specifications:
1963 AC Greyhound | 2003 MG TF | |
Make | AC | MG |
Model | Greyhound | TF |
Year Released | 1963 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6900 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 174 Nm |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1190 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 3950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1270 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2380 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 50 L |