1963 AC Greyhound vs. 2004 Fiat Stilo
To start off, 2004 Fiat Stilo is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 AC Greyhound is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 AC Greyhound (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 2004 Fiat Stilo. (90 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 AC Greyhound should accelerate faster than 2004 Fiat Stilo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Fiat Stilo weights approximately 75 kg more than 1963 AC Greyhound.
Let's talk about torque, 1963 AC Greyhound (179 Nm) has 51 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Fiat Stilo. (128 Nm). This means 1963 AC Greyhound will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Fiat Stilo.
Compare all specifications:
1963 AC Greyhound | 2004 Fiat Stilo | |
Make | AC | Fiat |
Model | Greyhound | Stilo |
Year Released | 1963 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 1368 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 90 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 128 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1090 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4190 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2670 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 58 L |