1963 AC Greyhound vs. 2004 Fiat Stilo
To start off, 2004 Fiat Stilo is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 AC Greyhound is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 AC Greyhound (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 2004 Fiat Stilo. (113 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 AC Greyhound should accelerate faster than 2004 Fiat Stilo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Fiat Stilo weights approximately 470 kg more than 1963 AC Greyhound.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Fiat Stilo (255 Nm) has 76 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 AC Greyhound. (179 Nm). This means 2004 Fiat Stilo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 AC Greyhound.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 AC Greyhound | 2004 Fiat Stilo | |
| Make | AC | Fiat |
| Model | Greyhound | Stilo |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 1908 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 113 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 179 Nm | 255 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1485 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4520 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1580 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2610 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 58 L |
