1963 AC Greyhound vs. 2004 Mazda 6
To start off, 2004 Mazda 6 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 2,262 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda 6 (168 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 1963 AC Greyhound. (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1963 AC Greyhound. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda 6 weights approximately 421 kg more than 1963 AC Greyhound. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda 6 (221 Nm) has 42 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 AC Greyhound. (179 Nm). This means 2004 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 AC Greyhound.
Compare all specifications:
1963 AC Greyhound | 2004 Mazda 6 | |
Make | AC | Mazda |
Model | Greyhound | 6 |
Year Released | 1963 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 2262 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 221 Nm |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1436 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 68 L |