1963 AC Greyhound vs. 2004 Mercedes-Benz Vaneo
To start off, 2004 Mercedes-Benz Vaneo is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 AC Greyhound is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 AC Greyhound (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 2004 Mercedes-Benz Vaneo. (94 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 AC Greyhound should accelerate faster than 2004 Mercedes-Benz Vaneo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mercedes-Benz Vaneo weights approximately 410 kg more than 1963 AC Greyhound.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mercedes-Benz Vaneo (180 Nm) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 AC Greyhound. (179 Nm). This means 2004 Mercedes-Benz Vaneo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 AC Greyhound.
Compare all specifications:
1963 AC Greyhound | 2004 Mercedes-Benz Vaneo | |
Make | AC | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Greyhound | Vaneo |
Year Released | 1963 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 1689 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 94 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 180 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1425 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4200 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2910 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 54 L |