1963 AC Greyhound vs. 2005 Chevrolet Aveo
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Aveo is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 AC Greyhound is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 AC Greyhound (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 2005 Chevrolet Aveo. (103 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 AC Greyhound should accelerate faster than 2005 Chevrolet Aveo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Aveo weights approximately 58 kg more than 1963 AC Greyhound.
Let's talk about torque, 1963 AC Greyhound (179 Nm) has 33 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Chevrolet Aveo. (146 Nm). This means 1963 AC Greyhound will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Chevrolet Aveo.
Compare all specifications:
1963 AC Greyhound | 2005 Chevrolet Aveo | |
Make | AC | Chevrolet |
Model | Greyhound | Aveo |
Year Released | 1963 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 1606 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 103 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 146 Nm |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1073 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4240 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2490 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 45 L |