1963 AC Greyhound vs. 2005 Dodge Charger
To start off, 2005 Dodge Charger is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 5,654 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Dodge Charger (340 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 217 more horse power than 1963 AC Greyhound. (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Dodge Charger should accelerate faster than 1963 AC Greyhound. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Dodge Charger weights approximately 813 kg more than 1963 AC Greyhound. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Dodge Charger (529 Nm) has 350 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 AC Greyhound. (179 Nm). This means 2005 Dodge Charger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 AC Greyhound.
Compare all specifications:
1963 AC Greyhound | 2005 Dodge Charger | |
Make | AC | Dodge |
Model | Greyhound | Charger |
Year Released | 1963 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 5654 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 340 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 529 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1828 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 5090 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3030 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 72 L |