1963 AC Greyhound vs. 2005 Toyota Camry
To start off, 2005 Toyota Camry is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 2,362 cc, 2005 Toyota Camry is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Toyota Camry (144 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 1963 AC Greyhound. (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Camry should accelerate faster than 1963 AC Greyhound. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 AC Greyhound weights approximately 75 kg more than 2005 Toyota Camry.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Toyota Camry (219 Nm) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 AC Greyhound. (179 Nm). This means 2005 Toyota Camry will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 AC Greyhound.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 AC Greyhound | 2005 Toyota Camry | |
| Make | AC | Toyota |
| Model | Greyhound | Camry |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 2362 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 144 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 179 Nm | 219 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 940 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2620 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 70 L |
