1963 AC Greyhound vs. 2005 Toyota Camry
To start off, 2005 Toyota Camry is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 2,358 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Toyota Camry is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Toyota Camry (154 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 1963 AC Greyhound. (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Camry should accelerate faster than 1963 AC Greyhound. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 AC Greyhound weights approximately 30 kg more than 2005 Toyota Camry.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Toyota Camry (221 Nm) has 42 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 AC Greyhound. (179 Nm). This means 2005 Toyota Camry will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 AC Greyhound.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 AC Greyhound | 2005 Toyota Camry | |
| Make | AC | Toyota |
| Model | Greyhound | Camry |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 2358 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 154 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 179 Nm | 221 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 985 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4810 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1800 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1500 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2790 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 70 L |
