1963 AC Greyhound vs. 2008 Toyota Highlander
To start off, 2008 Toyota Highlander is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 3,311 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Toyota Highlander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Toyota Highlander (209 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 86 more horse power than 1963 AC Greyhound. (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Toyota Highlander should accelerate faster than 1963 AC Greyhound. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Toyota Highlander weights approximately 315 kg more than 1963 AC Greyhound. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Toyota Highlander (287 Nm) has 108 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 AC Greyhound. (179 Nm). This means 2008 Toyota Highlander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 AC Greyhound.
Compare all specifications:
1963 AC Greyhound | 2008 Toyota Highlander | |
Make | AC | Toyota |
Model | Greyhound | Highlander |
Year Released | 1963 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 3311 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 209 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 287 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1330 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1920 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2800 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 65 L |