1963 AC Greyhound vs. 2009 Acura CSX
To start off, 2009 Acura CSX is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Acura CSX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Acura CSX (197 HP) has 74 more horse power than 1963 AC Greyhound. (123 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Acura CSX should accelerate faster than 1963 AC Greyhound. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Acura CSX weights approximately 298 kg more than 1963 AC Greyhound. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1963 AC Greyhound | 2009 Acura CSX | |
Make | AC | Acura |
Model | Greyhound | CSX |
Year Released | 1963 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 197 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1313 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4544 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1752 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1435 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2700 mm |