1963 AC Greyhound vs. 2009 BMW M3
To start off, 2009 BMW M3 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 3,999 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW M3 (414 HP @ 8300 RPM) has 291 more horse power than 1963 AC Greyhound. (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1963 AC Greyhound.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 BMW M3 (295 Nm) has 116 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 AC Greyhound. (179 Nm). This means 2009 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 AC Greyhound.
Compare all specifications:
1963 AC Greyhound | 2009 BMW M3 | |
Make | AC | BMW |
Model | Greyhound | M3 |
Year Released | 1963 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 3999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 414 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 8300 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 295 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2770 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 63 L |