1963 AC Greyhound vs. 2009 Chevrolet Traverse
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Traverse is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 3,599 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Traverse is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet Traverse (288 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 165 more horse power than 1963 AC Greyhound. (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Traverse should accelerate faster than 1963 AC Greyhound. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chevrolet Traverse weights approximately 246 kg more than 1963 AC Greyhound. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chevrolet Traverse (366 Nm) has 187 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 AC Greyhound. (179 Nm). This means 2009 Chevrolet Traverse will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 AC Greyhound.
Compare all specifications:
1963 AC Greyhound | 2009 Chevrolet Traverse | |
Make | AC | Chevrolet |
Model | Greyhound | Traverse |
Year Released | 1963 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 3599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 288 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 366 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1261 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 5210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 2000 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3030 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 83 L |