1963 AC Greyhound vs. 2009 Fiat Croma
To start off, 2009 Fiat Croma is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 AC Greyhound is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 AC Greyhound (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 2009 Fiat Croma. (118 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 AC Greyhound should accelerate faster than 2009 Fiat Croma. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Fiat Croma weights approximately 580 kg more than 1963 AC Greyhound.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Fiat Croma (280 Nm) has 101 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 AC Greyhound. (179 Nm). This means 2009 Fiat Croma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 AC Greyhound.
Compare all specifications:
1963 AC Greyhound | 2009 Fiat Croma | |
Make | AC | Fiat |
Model | Greyhound | Croma |
Year Released | 1963 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 1910 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 280 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1595 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1610 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 62 L |