1963 AC Greyhound vs. 2009 Ford Fusion
To start off, 2009 Ford Fusion is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 2,260 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Ford Fusion is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Fusion (160 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 1963 AC Greyhound. (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Fusion should accelerate faster than 1963 AC Greyhound. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 AC Greyhound weights approximately 49 kg more than 2009 Ford Fusion.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford Fusion (212 Nm) has 33 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 AC Greyhound. (179 Nm). This means 2009 Ford Fusion will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 AC Greyhound.
Compare all specifications:
1963 AC Greyhound | 2009 Ford Fusion | |
Make | AC | Ford |
Model | Greyhound | Fusion |
Year Released | 1963 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 2260 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 160 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 212 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 966 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2730 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 66 L |