1963 AC Greyhound vs. 2009 Mazda 5
To start off, 2009 Mazda 5 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda 5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 AC Greyhound (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 5. (108 HP @ 3500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 AC Greyhound should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 5 weights approximately 599 kg more than 1963 AC Greyhound.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda 5 (310 Nm) has 131 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 AC Greyhound. (179 Nm). This means 2009 Mazda 5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 AC Greyhound.
Compare all specifications:
1963 AC Greyhound | 2009 Mazda 5 | |
Make | AC | Mazda |
Model | Greyhound | 5 |
Year Released | 1963 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 310 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1614 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1620 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 60 L |