1963 AC Greyhound vs. 2009 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2009 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Toyota 4Runner (233 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 110 more horse power than 1963 AC Greyhound. (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 1963 AC Greyhound.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Toyota 4Runner (266 Nm) has 87 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 AC Greyhound. (179 Nm). This means 2009 Toyota 4Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 AC Greyhound.
Compare all specifications:
1963 AC Greyhound | 2009 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | AC | Toyota |
Model | Greyhound | 4Runner |
Year Released | 1963 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 4000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 233 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 266 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1920 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 50 L |