1963 AC Greyhound vs. 2010 Alfa Romeo Brera
To start off, 2010 Alfa Romeo Brera is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 3,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Alfa Romeo Brera is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Alfa Romeo Brera (256 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 133 more horse power than 1963 AC Greyhound. (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Alfa Romeo Brera should accelerate faster than 1963 AC Greyhound.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Alfa Romeo Brera (322 Nm) has 143 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 AC Greyhound. (179 Nm). This means 2010 Alfa Romeo Brera will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 AC Greyhound.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 AC Greyhound | 2010 Alfa Romeo Brera | |
| Make | AC | Alfa Romeo |
| Model | Greyhound | Brera |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 3195 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 256 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Torque | 179 Nm | 322 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1380 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1840 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2710 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 70 L |
