1963 AC Greyhound vs. 2010 Ford Expedition
To start off, 2010 Ford Expedition is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 5,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Ford Expedition is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford Expedition (310 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 187 more horse power than 1963 AC Greyhound. (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford Expedition should accelerate faster than 1963 AC Greyhound. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford Expedition weights approximately 1640 kg more than 1963 AC Greyhound. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford Expedition (494 Nm) has 315 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 AC Greyhound. (179 Nm). This means 2010 Ford Expedition will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 AC Greyhound.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 AC Greyhound | 2010 Ford Expedition | |
| Make | AC | Ford |
| Model | Greyhound | Expedition |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 5400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 310 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5100 RPM |
| Torque | 179 Nm | 494 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 8 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 2655 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 5621 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 2002 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1974 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3327 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 127 L |
