1963 AC Greyhound vs. 2010 Honda Ridgeline
To start off, 2010 Honda Ridgeline is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 3,471 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Honda Ridgeline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Honda Ridgeline (250 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 127 more horse power than 1963 AC Greyhound. (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Honda Ridgeline should accelerate faster than 1963 AC Greyhound. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Honda Ridgeline weights approximately 178 kg more than 1963 AC Greyhound. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Honda Ridgeline (335 Nm) has 156 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 AC Greyhound. (179 Nm). This means 2010 Honda Ridgeline will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 AC Greyhound.
Compare all specifications:
1963 AC Greyhound | 2010 Honda Ridgeline | |
Make | AC | Honda |
Model | Greyhound | Ridgeline |
Year Released | 1963 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 3471 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 250 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 335 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1193 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 5260 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3110 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 83 L |