1963 AC Greyhound vs. 2010 Honda Stream
To start off, 2010 Honda Stream is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 AC Greyhound is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 123 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Honda Stream weights approximately 101 kg more than 1963 AC Greyhound.
Let's talk about torque, 1963 AC Greyhound (179 Nm) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Honda Stream. (154 Nm). This means 1963 AC Greyhound will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Honda Stream.
Compare all specifications:
1963 AC Greyhound | 2010 Honda Stream | |
Make | AC | Honda |
Model | Greyhound | Stream |
Year Released | 1963 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 1668 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 154 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1116 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2690 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 55 L |