1963 AC Greyhound vs. 2011 Dodge Charger
To start off, 2011 Dodge Charger is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Dodge Charger (292 HP @ 6350 RPM) has 169 more horse power than 1963 AC Greyhound. (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Dodge Charger should accelerate faster than 1963 AC Greyhound. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Dodge Charger weights approximately 782 kg more than 1963 AC Greyhound. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2011 Dodge Charger (352 Nm) has 173 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 AC Greyhound. (179 Nm). This means 2011 Dodge Charger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 AC Greyhound.
Compare all specifications:
1963 AC Greyhound | 2011 Dodge Charger | |
Make | AC | Dodge |
Model | Greyhound | Charger |
Year Released | 1963 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 292 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6350 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 352 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1797 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 5077 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1905 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1483 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3053 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 72 L |