1963 AC Greyhound vs. 2011 Ford F-250
To start off, 2011 Ford F-250 is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Ford F-250 (385 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 262 more horse power than 1963 AC Greyhound. (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Ford F-250 should accelerate faster than 1963 AC Greyhound.
Let's talk about torque, 2011 Ford F-250 (548 Nm) has 369 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 AC Greyhound. (179 Nm). This means 2011 Ford F-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 AC Greyhound.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 AC Greyhound | 2011 Ford F-250 | |
| Make | AC | Ford |
| Model | Greyhound | F-250 |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 6200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 385 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 179 Nm | 548 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
| Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 6269 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 2029 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1966 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3967 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 132 L |
