1963 AC Greyhound vs. 2012 Chevrolet Tahoe
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Tahoe is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Chevrolet Tahoe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Chevrolet Tahoe (332 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 209 more horse power than 1963 AC Greyhound. (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Tahoe should accelerate faster than 1963 AC Greyhound. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Chevrolet Tahoe weights approximately 1524 kg more than 1963 AC Greyhound. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Chevrolet Tahoe (497 Nm) has 318 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 AC Greyhound. (179 Nm). This means 2012 Chevrolet Tahoe will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 AC Greyhound.
Compare all specifications:
1963 AC Greyhound | 2012 Chevrolet Tahoe | |
Make | AC | Chevrolet |
Model | Greyhound | Tahoe |
Year Released | 1963 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 6000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 332 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 497 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 2539 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 5131 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 2007 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1895 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2946 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 95 L |