1963 AC Greyhound vs. 2012 Ford C-Max
To start off, 2012 Ford C-Max is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Ford C-Max is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 AC Greyhound (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 2012 Ford C-Max. (113 HP @ 3750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 AC Greyhound should accelerate faster than 2012 Ford C-Max. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Ford C-Max weights approximately 535 kg more than 1963 AC Greyhound.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Ford C-Max (300 Nm) has 121 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 AC Greyhound. (179 Nm). This means 2012 Ford C-Max will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 AC Greyhound.
Compare all specifications:
1963 AC Greyhound | 2012 Ford C-Max | |
Make | AC | Ford |
Model | Greyhound | C-Max |
Year Released | 1963 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 113 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 300 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1550 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1828 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1684 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2788 mm |