1963 AC Greyhound vs. 2012 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2012 Ford Falcon is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 3,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Ford Falcon (265 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 142 more horse power than 1963 AC Greyhound. (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1963 AC Greyhound. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Ford Falcon weights approximately 742 kg more than 1963 AC Greyhound. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Ford Falcon (409 Nm) has 230 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 AC Greyhound. (179 Nm). This means 2012 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 AC Greyhound.
Compare all specifications:
1963 AC Greyhound | 2012 Ford Falcon | |
Make | AC | Ford |
Model | Greyhound | Falcon |
Year Released | 1963 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 3983 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 265 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 409 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1757 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4967 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1868 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1433 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2838 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 68 L |