1963 AC Greyhound vs. 2013 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2013 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Toyota 4Runner (266 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 143 more horse power than 1963 AC Greyhound. (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 1963 AC Greyhound. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 1169 kg more than 1963 AC Greyhound. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Toyota 4Runner (377 Nm) has 198 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 AC Greyhound. (179 Nm). This means 2013 Toyota 4Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 AC Greyhound.
Compare all specifications:
1963 AC Greyhound | 2013 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | AC | Toyota |
Model | Greyhound | 4Runner |
Year Released | 1963 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 4000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 266 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 377 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 2184 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1925 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2790 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 87 L |