1963 AC Greyhound vs. 2013 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2013 Toyota Tundra is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Toyota Tundra (233 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 110 more horse power than 1963 AC Greyhound. (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1963 AC Greyhound. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 1062 kg more than 1963 AC Greyhound. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Toyota Tundra (361 Nm) has 182 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 AC Greyhound. (179 Nm). This means 2013 Toyota Tundra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 AC Greyhound.
Compare all specifications:
1963 AC Greyhound | 2013 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | AC | Toyota |
Model | Greyhound | Tundra |
Year Released | 1963 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 4000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 233 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 361 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 2077 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 5329 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1935 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3221 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 100 L |