1963 Alfa Romeo 2600 vs. 1948 Studebaker Commander
To start off, 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Studebaker Commander. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Studebaker Commander would be higher. At 3,703 cc (6 cylinders), 1948 Studebaker Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600 (163 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 1948 Studebaker Commander. (94 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600 should accelerate faster than 1948 Studebaker Commander. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1948 Studebaker Commander weights approximately 88 kg more than 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Alfa Romeo 2600 | 1948 Studebaker Commander | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Studebaker |
Model | 2600 | Commander |
Year Released | 1963 | 1948 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2584 cc | 3703 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 163 HP | 94 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83.1 mm | 84.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79.6 mm | 111.1 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 1458 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 5200 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 3030 mm |