1963 Alfa Romeo 2600 vs. 1966 Sunbeam Tiger
To start off, 1966 Sunbeam Tiger is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600 would be higher. At 4,259 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Sunbeam Tiger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Sunbeam Tiger (163 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600. (143 HP @ 5900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Sunbeam Tiger should accelerate faster than 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600 weights approximately 80 kg more than 1966 Sunbeam Tiger.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Alfa Romeo 2600 | 1966 Sunbeam Tiger | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Sunbeam |
Model | 2600 | Tiger |
Year Released | 1963 | 1966 |
Body Type | Convertible | Roadster |
Engine Size | 2584 cc | 4259 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 143 HP | 163 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1220 kg | 1140 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 3970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2190 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 27 L |