1963 Alfa Romeo 2600 vs. 1981 Renault Siete

To start off, 1981 Renault Siete is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600 would be higher. At 2,584 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600 (163 HP) has 119 more horse power than 1981 Renault Siete. (44 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600 should accelerate faster than 1981 Renault Siete. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600 weights approximately 555 kg more than 1981 Renault Siete. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Renault Siete, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600 (220 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 136 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Renault Siete. (84 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Renault Siete.

Compare all specifications:

1963 Alfa Romeo 2600 1981 Renault Siete
Make Alfa Romeo Renault
Model 2600 Siete
Year Released 1963 1981
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2584 cc 1108 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 163 HP 44 HP
Torque 220 Nm 84 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 2000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 83.1 mm 70 mm
Engine Stroke Size 79.6 mm 72 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 8.3:1 9.5:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Vehicle Weight 1370 kg 815 kg
Vehicle Length 4380 mm 3900 mm
Vehicle Width 1710 mm 1530 mm
Vehicle Height 1390 mm 1430 mm
Wheelbase Size 2510 mm 2540 mm