1963 Alfa Romeo 2600 vs. 1989 Matra-Simca M25
To start off, 1989 Matra-Simca M25 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600 would be higher. At 2,584 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Matra-Simca M25 (363 Nm) has 143 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600. (220 Nm). This means 1989 Matra-Simca M25 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Alfa Romeo 2600 | 1989 Matra-Simca M25 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Matra-Simca |
Model | 2600 | M25 |
Year Released | 1963 | 1989 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2584 cc | 1764 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 163 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 220 Nm | 363 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |