1963 Alfa Romeo 2600 vs. 1992 Italdesign Columbus
To start off, 1992 Italdesign Columbus is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600 would be higher. At 4,988 cc (12 cylinders), 1992 Italdesign Columbus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Italdesign Columbus (295 HP) has 132 more horse power than 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600. (163 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Italdesign Columbus should accelerate faster than 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600.
Because 1992 Italdesign Columbus is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Italdesign Columbus will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Italdesign Columbus (450 Nm) has 230 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600. (220 Nm). This means 1992 Italdesign Columbus will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600 | 1992 Italdesign Columbus | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Italdesign |
| Model | 2600 | Columbus |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1992 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 2584 cc | 4988 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 163 HP | 295 HP |
| Torque | 220 Nm | 450 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 83.1 mm | 84.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 79.6 mm | 74.9 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 8.8:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 6000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 2200 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 2200 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 3830 mm |
