1963 Alfa Romeo 2600 vs. 1992 Pontiac Bonneville

To start off, 1992 Pontiac Bonneville is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600 would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Pontiac Bonneville is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Pontiac Bonneville (205 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600. (163 HP @ 5900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Pontiac Bonneville should accelerate faster than 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Pontiac Bonneville weights approximately 266 kg more than 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Pontiac Bonneville, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Pontiac Bonneville (353 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 133 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600. (220 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1992 Pontiac Bonneville will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600.

Compare all specifications:

1963 Alfa Romeo 2600 1992 Pontiac Bonneville
Make Alfa Romeo Pontiac
Model 2600 Bonneville
Year Released 1963 1992
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2584 cc 3791 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 163 HP 205 HP
Engine RPM 5900 RPM 4400 RPM
Torque 220 Nm 353 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 2800 RPM
Engine Bore Size 83.1 mm 96.6 mm
Engine Stroke Size 79.6 mm 86.4 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 8.3:1 8.5:1
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1370 kg 1636 kg
Vehicle Length 4380 mm 5100 mm
Vehicle Width 1710 mm 1880 mm
Vehicle Height 1390 mm 1420 mm
Wheelbase Size 2510 mm 2820 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]