1963 Alfa Romeo 2600 vs. 1995 Daewoo No 1
To start off, 1995 Daewoo No 1 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600 would be higher. At 2,584 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600 (143 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 1995 Daewoo No 1. (89 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600 should accelerate faster than 1995 Daewoo No 1.
Because 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Daewoo No 1, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600 (216 Nm) has 79 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Daewoo No 1. (137 Nm). This means 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Daewoo No 1.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600 | 1995 Daewoo No 1 | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Daewoo |
| Model | 2600 | No 1 |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2584 cc | 1498 cc |
| Horse Power | 143 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 216 Nm | 137 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
