1963 Alfa Romeo 2600 vs. 1996 Subaru Outback
To start off, 1996 Subaru Outback is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600 would be higher. At 2,584 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Subaru Outback (165 HP) has 22 more horse power than 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600. (143 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Subaru Outback should accelerate faster than 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600.
Because 1996 Subaru Outback is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Subaru Outback will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Subaru Outback (221 Nm) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600. (216 Nm). This means 1996 Subaru Outback will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600 | 1996 Subaru Outback | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Subaru |
| Model | 2600 | Outback |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1996 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Station Wagon |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2584 cc | 2501 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 143 HP | 165 HP |
| Torque | 216 Nm | 221 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 99.6 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 79.6 mm | 79 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4380 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2530 mm |
