1963 Alfa Romeo 2600 vs. 1998 Mazda 323

To start off, 1998 Mazda 323 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600 would be higher. At 2,584 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600 (163 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 1998 Mazda 323. (114 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600 should accelerate faster than 1998 Mazda 323. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600 weights approximately 242 kg more than 1998 Mazda 323. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Mazda 323, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600 (220 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 58 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Mazda 323. (162 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Mazda 323.

Compare all specifications:

1963 Alfa Romeo 2600 1998 Mazda 323
Make Alfa Romeo Mazda
Model 2600 323
Year Released 1963 1998
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2584 cc 1840 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 163 HP 114 HP
Engine RPM 5900 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 220 Nm 162 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 4000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 83.1 mm 83 mm
Engine Stroke Size 79.6 mm 85 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 8.3:1 9.7:1
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1370 kg 1128 kg
Vehicle Length 4380 mm 4320 mm
Vehicle Width 1710 mm 1710 mm
Vehicle Height 1390 mm 1420 mm
Wheelbase Size 2510 mm 2520 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 60 L 55 L