1963 Alfa Romeo 2600 vs. 2000 Chevrolet Camaro

To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600 would be higher. At 9,371 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chevrolet Camaro (770 HP) has 627 more horse power than 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600. (143 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600 weights approximately 33 kg more than 2000 Chevrolet Camaro.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chevrolet Camaro (926 Nm) has 710 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600. (216 Nm). This means 2000 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600.

Compare all specifications:

1963 Alfa Romeo 2600 2000 Chevrolet Camaro
Make Alfa Romeo Chevrolet
Model 2600 Camaro
Year Released 1963 2000
Body Type Convertible Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2584 cc 9371 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 143 HP 770 HP
Torque 216 Nm 926 Nm
Engine Bore Size 83 mm 114.3 mm
Engine Stroke Size 79.6 mm 114.3 mm
Top Speed 185 km/hour 370 km/hour
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 2 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1220 kg 1187 kg
Vehicle Width 1680 mm 1610 mm
Wheelbase Size 2590 mm 2570 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 100 L 64 L