1963 Alfa Romeo 2600 vs. 2000 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2000 Dodge Ram is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600 would be higher. At 5,900 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Dodge Ram weights approximately 70 kg more than 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600.
Because 2000 Dodge Ram is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Dodge Ram will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Dodge Ram (468 Nm) has 248 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600. (220 Nm). This means 2000 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600 | 2000 Dodge Ram | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Dodge |
| Model | 2600 | Ram |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2584 cc | 5900 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 163 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 220 Nm | 468 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 6 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 1440 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 6200 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 2020 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1820 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 3940 mm |
