1963 Alfa Romeo 2600 vs. 2000 Ford Equator
To start off, 2000 Ford Equator is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600 would be higher. At 2,584 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600 (163 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 2000 Ford Equator. (128 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600 should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Equator. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600 weights approximately 162 kg more than 2000 Ford Equator. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600 (220 Nm) has 60 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford Equator. (160 Nm). This means 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford Equator.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Alfa Romeo 2600 | 2000 Ford Equator | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Ford |
Model | 2600 | Equator |
Year Released | 1963 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2584 cc | 1787 cc |
Horse Power | 163 HP | 128 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 220 Nm | 160 Nm |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 1208 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 3260 mm |