1963 Alfa Romeo 2600 vs. 2000 Ford Ka

To start off, 2000 Ford Ka is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600 would be higher. At 2,584 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600 (163 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 104 more horse power than 2000 Ford Ka. (59 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600 should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Ka. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600 weights approximately 490 kg more than 2000 Ford Ka. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Ford Ka, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600 (220 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 115 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford Ka. (105 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1963 Alfa Romeo 2600 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford Ka.

Compare all specifications:

1963 Alfa Romeo 2600 2000 Ford Ka
Make Alfa Romeo Ford
Model 2600 Ka
Year Released 1963 2000
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2584 cc 1299 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 163 HP 59 HP
Engine RPM 5900 RPM 5000 RPM
Torque 220 Nm 105 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 2500 RPM
Engine Bore Size 83.1 mm 74.1 mm
Engine Stroke Size 79.6 mm 75.5 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 8.3:1 9.5:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 4 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 3 doors
Vehicle Weight 1370 kg 880 kg
Vehicle Length 4380 mm 3630 mm
Vehicle Width 1710 mm 1640 mm
Vehicle Height 1390 mm 1380 mm
Wheelbase Size 2510 mm 2460 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 60 L 40 L